Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_19.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:29:12
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3972 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3673 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6561 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5942 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5790 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5500 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.8502 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7730 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0704 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7199 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5584 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4338 minutes

ans =

    12

CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.32, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -6.38, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.09, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAUA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.41, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -5.06, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -6.38, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -9.84, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.37, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UUGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.53, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUACU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.92, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.13, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.49, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score     -10.29, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAUCUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UACCCA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.10, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GCCGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.67, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CCUCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.00, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.30, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGUGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGCUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.23, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.73, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.73, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AGCACU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.13, deficit  1.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UAUUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGGUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUCCAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.04, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUCAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.83, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
ACUGAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.05, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGUAUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGCAAA 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.06, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GCGCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.21, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GCCGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.21, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.06, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UAUAGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.10, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -4.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GCUGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -8.57, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
UUUCUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -12.13, deficit  9.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.70, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
UGAUGA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.15, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GUUAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUGUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGGUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.68, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -9.75, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.66, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGACAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -9.30, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUCAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GAUUUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -6.71, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
CUAGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CCCGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.96, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AAGGUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.81, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGAGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCACUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.69, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -3.53, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAGUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUGAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.78, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUCAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.24, deficit  3.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -9.65, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.73, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CAAGAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGAAAUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GAGAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.28, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGUUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
AUCAACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.96, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUCCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.43, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CGAGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.07, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGCGAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.23, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GCAGUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GAUGGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GCUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.91, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUCCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCUAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score     -10.19, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGGUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -12.04, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
AAGAGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score     -10.03, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGACUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
UGAAGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.20, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAUACAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.53, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.30, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GACACUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.26, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score     -10.11, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.96, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGCUGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGGUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.28, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
CGCUAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.15, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUGUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.79, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
AUUAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.10, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUAUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -6.98, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -7.51, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGGAUAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.24, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UUUCAUAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAAAUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.97, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUCAACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.16, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCAAGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGGAGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUACUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.16, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUGAUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.83, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGCUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGAUGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.10, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.91, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGCCAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GUGAGAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.63, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UCAUCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
AUCAUAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -12.43, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GUCAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.98, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGUAGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.64, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGGACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.97, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAGUGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.95, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UAGACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score     -11.75, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGGUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -10.00, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCCAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGAAAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.59, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCGAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.59, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUUGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.72, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGUUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.18, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCGCUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.86, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUUGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.16, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GUAUCGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.80, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UAACAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -11.68, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.34, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.12, deficit -0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UAGAGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.26, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUUCAACG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -5.05, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CAUUCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.56, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UAGGCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -15.45, deficit  8.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UGGGCAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.73, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CCUAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -5.71, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCUUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CCGGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -7.58, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
ACAUAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CAGCAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUUGGAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.42, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAACGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.00, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.48, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAGAUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.89, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGUUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -11.21, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCACGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.85, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGAAGAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score     -11.18, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.87, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUAAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.80, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UGAAAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -13.24, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGAAACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -11.85, deficit  7.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCCUGCGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.20, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CACUGCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.18, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
GGAUCGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.24, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.52, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGAAACAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.18, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUAUAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -7.87, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UUUCAAUUA 1  Matches 11; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -6.00, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAACGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGUGAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.64, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUGACAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -5.64, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGUCUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UAAGAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.04, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCCCAGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.83, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGCUCCUCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGAGAAAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GUGAGAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -10.29, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUUUUAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -6.77, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUUCUUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.80, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAAAUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.93, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUGUAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.79, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGUUAAAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.27, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
AGUUCCGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -10.58, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UAGAGGCUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.01, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GCGGAUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.03, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCCUUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.98, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UGCGCGGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUGUAGGU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -6.47, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCCAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GAGGCUGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -8.78, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CAGGUUAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.66, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CCGAACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.19, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAGGAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUAGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.67, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -9.75, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GAGCAGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.74, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GAAAAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.10, deficit  6.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGUAGUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.79, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUCCUUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.41, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCCACUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -6.09, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GCCACAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.10, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GGGAUCAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -12.42, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
UUAAUUGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.99, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUGGUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGACGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.00, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GAUUAGGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.84, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CUAUUCCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.95, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCUAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.87, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUCAAAUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.99, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCGGAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.12, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.82, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGUAACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGAGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.62, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCAACUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.89, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CACAGGGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GUUGACAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.13, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAAAAAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.12, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAGCGAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.65, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUGCAAGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.07, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUCCUUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CCAAGACCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAGCAGCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUGAACAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.19, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GCGUAGCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.53, deficit  5.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUAGAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCGAUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.75, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UUUAAUUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.36, deficit  8.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUUUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.61, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCGAGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.33, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAGAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.55, deficit  6.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGUACUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.70, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUAGGUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.03, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGCAGGUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.84, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CCUAGCGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -9.94, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCUCUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GCAUAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGGAAAGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGGAUAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.92, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAACGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
AUUCUUCAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.83, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGAGAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.94, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAAAUCGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -11.62, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUCAGGAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGUGAGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.74, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGGAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.88, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACCAAUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.24, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACGAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.40, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGGGUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.88, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGGGGUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.27, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAACAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -11.93, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCUAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -7.93, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCUCGCGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.76, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUUUUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.57, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GAAGCGAAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.50, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CAUUCCGCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.10, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAUCGAGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.28, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
UACCCGAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.21, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAAACGAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCACAUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.35, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UAUUGGUUAUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.21, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUUGCCAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.83, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUAAAUUGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUUCUGUCUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGCAUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.84, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUUCAAAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -7.06, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGAAACUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.15, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAUUAGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.31, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGAGAAACA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.81, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
UGGGCAAGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.85, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCAGGAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CAUGAAAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.52, deficit 10.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAACAGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.97, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACUCCGAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.93, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GCGGAAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.27, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUAACAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.35, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAAAAAUGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score      -8.96, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUGAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.21, deficit  6.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAAAGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUAAUUGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.90, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AUGGGUAACAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.48, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUCGCUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.93, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUCAGAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -10.97, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUCAUUCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.87, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AUGAAAACUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.77, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAACAAAGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.44, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACUAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.23, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CAAAUUUAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.29, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
AGCGCCGUGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.71, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
AAUUCUAAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.40, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCAAGUAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.90, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUCUGAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -15.29, deficit  5.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAGCUGCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.19, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUGGACAAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GCUGGAAAACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.48, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GACGGAUUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -13.26, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.23, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUAAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -11.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AGGGAAAUGACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.75, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAAAAUCACAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.34, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAAAACUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GAAGGAGGCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.44, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGACCUGUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AUCUAAGAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.50, deficit  8.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AAUCAAAUUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.21, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGAGGUAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -16.62, deficit  9.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGGGCGAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.52, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUCCGUAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -14.67, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CGAAGGUCAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.53, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGACACCUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.05, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUCAUGAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.83, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGCACAAUGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.42, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GUGCUCGAAAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.26, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAAUGAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.02, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAGCAUGUGCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -18.96, deficit 10.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGAAACUGUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.60, deficit  5.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAUUAGUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.99, deficit  8.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAGGGGGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.75, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGAUCAACUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.36, deficit  9.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAAGGACUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.97, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCCUGUCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.02, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UUGAUCAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.76, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGUUACUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.38, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.35, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUAGGAGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.62, deficit  7.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGAAUUGUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score      -9.02, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGCACUUGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -12.64, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CACAGGCGGGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -13.07, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.72, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UGAAAGGAGAGUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -14.74, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
UGGAAUGAGGAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.96, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
UGGAACUUGACAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.06, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
UGAUCUGAGGAUUUAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -17.83, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.03, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 81.4737	 69.2632	4
5	100.0000	 90.7368	 47.0526	23
6	100.0000	 86.0000	 45.6842	60
7	 99.8947	 50.2105	 13.2632	51
8	 99.3684	 26.9474	  3.7895	46
9	 99.3684	 19.0526	  1.6842	68
10	 95.4737	  8.6316	  0.2105	41
11	 83.2632	  4.1053	  0.0000	42
12	 44.8421	  0.6316	  0.0000	23
13	 18.0000	  0.3158	  0.0000	12
14	  6.9474	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.3158	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3684	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6316	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3158	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1053	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  78 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 189 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 190 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 331 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 338 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 349 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 355 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 364 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 408 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 412 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 414 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 415 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 426 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 427 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 483 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 523 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 528 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 542 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 570 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 575 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 581 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 586 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 586 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 587 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 602 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 604 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 619 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 667 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 668 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 680 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 682 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 720 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 724 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 826 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 830 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 843 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 892 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 900 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 982 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 1019 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 1030 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 1042 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 1072 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 1109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 1136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1349 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1414 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1790 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4956%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.54
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.34
